Get the feed!
Online poll causes debate
Read the article / show / issue that provoked me to write a letter and my response below that or go straight to my response
Date Posted on this Site
July 2, 2007
Publication
Sarnia Observer
Publication Date
June 29, 2007
Published Content
An online experiment involving the CBC and Facebook has become dominated by debates over abortion and same-sex marriage, with the public broadcaster defending the informal poll as a successful foray into new media.
The Great Canadian Wish List in which Canadians are encouraged to visit a Facebook page to post their hope for the future comes to a close this weekend with a call to ban abortion as the No. 1 entry as of Wednesday.
The outcome has observers pointing to the sophisticated ways that lobby groups are infiltrating and taking advantage of social networking sites, and CBC fans questioning the public broadcaster's judgment.
"I don't know that it's made CBC look like a responsible broadcaster, I don't know that it's made it look like they're on the forefront of incorporating new technology into their media palate," said journalist Elaine Corden, who wrote a column about the wish list for the Tyee.ca.
"In some ways it's kind of embarrassing for them."
"It's made the CBC look like they did something without being able to anticipate how easily a blatantly populist scheme could be perverted or hijacked or whatever you want to call it by special interest groups."
Controversy has dogged the Great Canadian Wish List since it was launched on May 28, with conservative views on abortion, marriage and religion overtaking calls for better health care and education by Day 2. As of Wednesday afternoon, roughly 18,000 Facebook members had submitted their hopes for the future, with the top five wishes being: 1. ban abortion; 2. continue to allow abortion; 3. have "a spiritual revival in our nation"; 4. restore the traditional definition of marriage; 5. lower or eliminate tuition fees.
The winner will be announced on Canada Day on CBC Newsworld, says CBC reporter Mike Wise, who came up with the wish list project with youth group Student Vote.
Wise admits the Facebook page has been beset with problems, noting that for a time a technical glitch allowed users to vote more than once and that there's nothing to stop ardent lobbyists from setting up dummy Facebook accounts to bolster the numbers for their campaign.
And because the site is global, there's no guarantee that those voting for the Great Canadian Wish List are even Canadian. More than two million Canadians are members of Facebook.
Despite its faults, Wise says the project has succeeded in generating great discussion and in giving a forum to issues that otherwise may be overlooked by mainstream media.
"There's inherent risks involved with this and yeah, things come back to cause some concern," says Wise, noting the site has seen a fair bit of "juvenile" and "bullying" behaviour.
"We stepped out into an area where, because it was on Facebook, it was beyond the reach of the CBC journalistic policy so it was edgier stuff that we had no control of. However, I think we should get some marks for trying something different."
Wise says the project was never meant to provide an accurate poll, but rather as an experiment to see how the broadcaster could harness the power of social networking sites to reach its audience.
Journalism professor Alfred Hermida says it was a good idea but poorly executed. He said the CBC should have tried to maintain some control over content by hosting the survey on its own site, but acknowledged that Facebook's immense popularity made it an attractive platform to reach the young and hip and that hosting the project would have required immense time and resources.
My Response Letter
Does the Sarnia Observer, or anyone else, have evidence that "special interest groups" have "hijacked" an online poll that suggests most Canadians want abortion banned? If so, the smoking gun wasn't provided in the article. Instead, we were treated to a sour sounding journalist who blasted the CBC for allowing lobby groups to "pervert" the populist poll. Would the same charge have been levelled against the pro abortion crowd had the results been different. Somehow, I don't think the article would have been written.
Jason Gennaro
Was my response published?
No